A Model for a Motivational System Grounded on Value Based Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
نویسندگان
چکیده
Digital interventions for promoting behavioural changes have become more and more prevalent, due to the ubiquitous role played by the Web 2.0. Not many of these programmes are however grounded on well established theories, both from a psychological and from a dialogue perspective. We present in this paper a model for incorporating a general framework for abstract argumentation, into a motivational intervention based on the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change. A preliminary implementation of the model as a proof of concept has been carried out on the domain of healthy eating.
منابع مشابه
The DIAMOND System for Argumentation: Preliminary Report
Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are a powerful generalisation of Dung’s abstract argumentation frameworks. In this paper we present an answer set programming based software system, called DIAMOND (DIAlectical MOdels eNcoDing). It translates ADFs into answer set programs whose stable models correspond to models of the ADF with respect to several semantics (i.e. admissible, complete, stabl...
متن کاملArgTools: a backtracking-based solver for abstract argumentation
We present ArgTools, a system for reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. The system solves a number of argumentation problems under preferred, stable, complete and grounded semantics. ArgTools is a C++ implementation of a backtracking algorithm.
متن کاملArguments About Values
Arguments are more or less persuasive depending on the values their outcomes promote and demote. This idea, closely related to Perelman’s ideas work on argumentation, has been formally modeled by Bench-Capon in his well-known Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks, based on Dung’s abstract argumentation. In this paper, the question is addressed how arguments about which values are promoted and de...
متن کاملTowards a Common Framework for Dialectical Proof Procedures in Abstract Argumentation
We present a common framework for dialectical proof procedures for computing credulous, grounded, ideal and sceptical preferred semantics of abstract argumentation. The framework is based on the notions of dispute derivation and base derivation. Dispute derivation is a dialectical notion first introduced for computing credulous semantics in assumption-based argumentation, and adapted here for c...
متن کاملZJU-ARG: A Decomposition-Based Solver for Abstract Argumentation
Argumentation Qianle Guo and Beishui Liao 1 Center for the Study of Language and Cognition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, P.R.China 2 University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Abstract. This paper gives the system description of a solver for abstract argumentation ZJU-ARG submitted to the First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA’15). It adopts a decompo...
متن کامل